A Star Trek lead that doesn't care enough about the franchise to even learn who has been in it. Sad.
Sad, maybe, but a problem? Hardly.
At this point, I think that people are just latching on to whatever they can to hate on the new series without even giving it a chance, and to be honest, they've done this EVERY time a new Star Trek series has come about going all the way back to the launch of TNG, always saying that it won't live up to what came before, and in so doing, set it up for failure.
Sure, DS9 started rough but in time did a lot more for the franchise than any of the other series (in terms of lore, character development, etc. Hell, what we as fans see as Klingons today we owe to DS9 and its development of Worf.), and Voyager was 'meh' but it wasn't terrible. Enterprise was mismanaged and its final season was criminally underrated and the finale was just criminal, but that wasn't the series' fault.
Sure, CBS has done some highly questionable and unpopular things in the last few years (IE Axanar to name a big one), but if we want to continue getting Star Trek
at all, at least some leway should be given.
People who throw around negativity for negativity's sake "Are the reason we can't have nice things." If you want a good example, look at Mass Effect Andromeda: Good game, medocure story, and flaws that were eventually fixed, but the massive backlash has all but killed the franchise for everyone.