communications relay login

The Science Behind Rademaker's Warp Ship

Faster-than-light travel. Warp speed. Hyperdrive. Whatever form it takes, the ability to quickly travel the vast distances of space with ease is part and parcel of nearly all science fiction stories.

By Remissus Sat 14 Jun, 2014 11:00 PM - Last Updated: Mon 04 Apr, 2016 12:05 AM
Faster-than-light travel. Warp speed. Hyperdrive. Whatever form it takes, the ability to quickly travel the vast distances of space with ease is part and parcel of nearly all science fiction stories. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

For the most part this sort of technology has existed purely in the realm of said fiction- An alluring but just out of reach goal for mankind to strive after. So like many long time Star Trek fans I was extremely excited to read about what much of the internet has dubbed as the 'Rademaker warp ship'. It certainly looks legitimate, with news articles across a number of seemingly trustworthy sites! And it even has the name Enterprise! But before anyone gets too excited and starts dashing off to San Francisco to look for the nearest Starfleet recruiter, let's take a peek at what I found when digging a little deeper into the material behind some of these articles. NASA, for example, has this to say on their official website:

“Warp Drives", "Hyperspace Drives", or any other term for Faster-than-light travel is at the level of speculation, with some facets edging into the realm of science. We are at the point where we know what we do know and know what we don’t, but do not know for sure if faster than light travel is possible.”

This would seem to be the end of the story, right? A final word from probably the most reliable source on all things space travel? Well... Not exactly. Most of the images being passed around are merely theoretical interpretations of what such a ship might look like, done by Star Trek artist Mark Rademaker under commission from NASA. However, my research also discovered that the Alcubierre Drive is in fact both real and viable! ...At least on paper, the only realm in which it has been mathematically proven to work. According to NASA scientist Dr. Harold White, one of the inventors of the Alcubierre Drive, it functions by exerting a tremendous amount of energy to 'fold' space-time around the vessel- In effect, moving the space around the ship instead of moving the craft itself.

How would it accomplish this? Note the outer rings on the design- These 'warp rings' would be charged with 'negative energy' that could be turned on and off at will to create the fold. However, the mere existence of 'negative energy' itself is currently under debate. Classic physics would lead scientists to believe it is an impossibility, but recent advancements in quantum physics suggest it may not be quite as far-fetched as previously thought. Additionally, even if this energy exists at all, Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir suggests that it would only exist within black holes; whose own existence is still debated to this day. The problems here, then, are threefold- We need for black holes to exist, we need for negative energy to exist, we need a means of gathering and controlling both. And all this is completely setting aside the issues with life support, structural engineering, and navigation that such a ship would face!

So the end verdict of my research is that the IXS Enterprise is not a reality just yet- But don't despair! With scientists like Harold White making enough headway for the Alcubierre Drive to have made the news online with such aplomb, it's clear that humanity is edging ever closer to the day when we'll be able to take to the stars and boldly go where no man has gone before.

What do you think about the exciting prospects of Warp Travel should the day come? Be sure to let us know in the comments!

Be sure to check out Jake Tyler's Article on 'Warp Drive, Needed or Not'.
8 Comments
Sat 14 Jun, 2014 11:03 PM
This was my first article, so constructive feedback is appreciated! Smile
Sun 15 Jun, 2014 12:51 AM
I'm not sure that I have much in the way of criticism, but I wanted to express my appreciation for this article. I'm a fan of any article that covers both sides of a topic (especially a topic as debatable as the reality of warp drive) and leaves the reader with the option to still make up their own mind.

While you clearly are excited about the possibility of this technology (as am I) you did a great job of highlighting the problems with the current design and theories, while pointing out where hope lies ahead. The link at the bottom was a nice touch as well.

Overall, I enjoyed the article and that you left people like me with the hope of still seeing a warp drive in my lifetime. Even if today's discovery is only the first step, it's an important step, and you expressed that well. Good job and well written!
Mon 16 Jun, 2014 4:48 AM
This was a great article, and you did a great job articulating some of the science behind the design. The original article also mentioned other blocking issues surrounding the fold of space-time, but the fact that the negative energy may not even exist trumps both of those concerns. Well done!
Mon 16 Jun, 2014 7:53 PM
This warp Drive will be the perfect weapon, as it is likely that it will destroy everything that comes in his path of travel. http://www.universetoday.com/93882/w...#ixzz34HJTDkWl
Mon 16 Jun, 2014 8:39 PM
This warp Drive will be the perfect weapon, as it is likely that it will destroy everything that comes in his path of travel. http://www.universetoday.com/93882/w...#ixzz34HJTDkWl
This sounds like my freeway commute home from work... just replace "warp drive" with "average driver". BAM.
Mon 16 Jun, 2014 9:04 PM
That's assuming you can get up to speed. THere's also concerns quantum effects will make a bubble at superluminal speeds unstable (causing it's collapse) and that hawking radiation will be generated and bake the craft generating the field.
===
I found a presentation by the originator of this particular idea
http://ccrg.rit.edu/files/FasterThanLight.pdf
Fri 04 Jul, 2014 12:48 AM
Great Article! It was a good read.
Sat 02 Aug, 2014 12:44 PM
Just a side note: Has the experimental proof of gravity come up with any thing?

Long standing debate as to whether speed of light effects "speed of gravity" (or vice versa). If gravity can be shown to exceed speed of light than at least that hurdle is out of the way. It also opens up several different FTL possiblities...

On your article I had read and appreciated the piece and never even thought that it was a first time writers work. You put out very professional work, and I hope you continue to do so in the future.