The rollaway risks associated with the vehicle are as a result of drivers thinking they were in park when they actually weren't as the Jeep Grand Cherokee doesn't make it very clear.
The recall (which was voluntary) was not to fix a mechanical fault it was in order to add additional warnings to the driver and change the scenarios in which the vehicle could move. As yet I do not believe there have been any confirmed reports as to whether Yelchin took advantage of the recall offer or not and Fiat Chrysler Automotive have not responded.
It is extremely disappointing and worrying that a car manufacturer with as much experience can't do a good job of making it clear to drivers whether or not they are in park but so far no evidence of anything mechanically wrong with the vehicle has been reported.
Fiat Chrysler Automotive were quoted in my news article as are details of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigations in to the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
As for the LA Times article that does also confirm that "Drivers could mistakenly believe that the car was placed in park and exit the vehicle, and if the parking brake was not applied and the car was still running, the car could roll away and cause injury" and that "operation of the gear shift was “not intuitive” and gave “poor tactile and visual feedback to the driver, increasing the potential for unintended gear selection.”' Which is in line with what was reported here.
I could have gone in to more detail about the issues with the Jeep Grand Cherokee but made the conscious decision not to as I felt the article gave sufficient detail to readers and I didn't want the history of the car to overshadow Yelchin's life and accomplishments.
Again it is ridiculous that Fiat Chrysler Automotive can't make it obvious to drivers whether or not a vehicle is in park but the Police reports have confirmed that the vehicle was not in park and was left running which is what was reported, no judgements about anyone were implied or made in the article.