You can view the article at https://ufplanets.com/news.php?1387-...Banned-Account
Bronze Contributor
Awarded during the UFP Award Ceremony to those who go above and beyond for the community
Unlocked Sat 27 Jun, 2020 9:10 PM
0.24% have received this achievement
Be Federation News Service CO
Unlocked Sun 09 May, 2021 2:02 PM
0.08% have received this achievement
Be a member of the Holodeck
Unlocked Fri 24 Jan, 2020 9:00 PM
12.99% have received this achievement
Be a member of Starfleet Academy
Unlocked Sun 16 Feb, 2020 2:02 PM
0.49% have received this achievement
Be a writer for the Federation News Service
Unlocked Tue 04 Feb, 2020 12:01 PM
0.44% have received this achievement
Join the United Federation of Planets
Unlocked Fri 24 Jan, 2020 9:00 PM
32.61% have received this achievement
You can view the article at https://ufplanets.com/news.php?1387-...Banned-Account
Quartermaster
Awarded during the UFP Award Ceremony to those who go above and beyond for the community
Unlocked Sat 25 Mar, 2023 10:30 PM
0.24% have received this achievement
Volunteer for 1+ year
Unlocked Sat 20 Feb, 2021 11:02 PM
0.55% have received this achievement
Got pranked on April 1st
Unlocked Thu 01 Apr, 2021 2:04 PM
0.46% have received this achievement
Reach one-thousand posts on the forums
Unlocked Wed 02 Feb, 2022 3:03 AM
0.71% have received this achievement
Receive a promotion to the rank of Rear Admiral
Unlocked Sat 24 Sep, 2022 8:37 PM
0.47% have received this achievement
Participate in a Short Story Competition
Unlocked Tue 29 Dec, 2020 5:16 PM
0.12% have received this achievement
Interesting story. I had seen the headlines hit various news outlets, but this is the first I saw anything about the resolution.
As fun as it can be to bash Cryptic, I can see both sides of the argument here. The LTS unlocks a laundry list of perks for players, including exclusive ships, player races, items, etc. That's a lot of different subsystems within the game to try to "undo", and it is unclear how many of those exclusives the player may have made use of. We've all seen how even the most simple of fix requests can take forever for the small dev team STO has available. Coupled with a hostile threat of international litigation, giving back the money would be the easiest course of action to avoid that litigation, and locking down the account makes sense if they are otherwise unable to roll back the LTS unlocks. Retaining a lawyer is far more expensive than the price tag of a single LTS after all. It also is one of the worst possible choices that could have been made from a Customer Service angle, and in this case this Reddit post went viral and blew up in Cryptic's face.
Kael stepping in to make amends is good, but obviously a lot of people are going to doubt Cryptic even more going forward. That said, we only know what the Reddit poster is telling us about this story, so there may be pieces of the story we aren't seeing here, such as possible warning of the ban prior to it happening. The LTS sale page explicitly states "Subscription fees are non-refundable. We make no explicit or implicit warranties on the service period of the game.", so the expectation of a refund is an extraordinary action, and threats of "laywering up" suggest some degree of belligerence. I think there were probably faults on both sides of this story.
Win a Short Story Competition
Unlocked Sat 08 Apr, 2017 11:32 AM
0.04% have received this achievement
Be a registered user for 10 years
Unlocked Sat 28 Aug, 2021 2:05 AM
34.84% have received this achievement
Going from Clearance Level 3 to Clearance Level 4
Unlocked Sat 29 Sep, 2018 1:28 PM
1.91% have received this achievement
Ascend the ranks to reach the Captains chair
Unlocked Mon 29 Nov, 2021 10:23 AM
0.67% have received this achievement
Be a member of Starfleet Tactical
Grandfathered
7.01% have received this achievement
Sit and pass the Academy Command Exam
Unlocked Sat 05 Aug, 2017 3:02 PM
4.56% have received this achievement
I think that there are arguments for both sides of the issue here. I think that mattpoly made too much of an issue about a few shared bank slots but i also think that Cryptic went to far to fast banning a ten year old, life time, account. Both sides might have been less rigid in their communication towards eachother. The outcome, in my opinion, is the best mattpoly could ask for at this point, and both sides would be wise to let the issue rest from here on out.
𝔡𝔢𝔲ℨ𝔦𝔤𝔢 𝔅𝔯𝔢𝔡𝔞